tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26159610.post6811237101221233646..comments2023-09-29T02:29:58.920-05:00Comments on At the Hillocks of Hysteria: A Man of Means By No MeansThe Old Stoogehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16322776440795961345noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26159610.post-40567111400458164782007-05-16T05:43:00.000-05:002007-05-16T05:43:00.000-05:00Please; It's Joey Fat-Tony.Please; It's Joey Fat-Tony.DiscordianStoogehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03873734789014349292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26159610.post-79380595769600941102007-05-15T17:38:00.000-05:002007-05-15T17:38:00.000-05:00NOOO! First Jerry Falwell, now Drive 105! Who's n...NOOO! First Jerry Falwell, now Drive 105! Who's next? Joey Fat One?<BR/><BR/>-TKAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26159610.post-75197124139747072302007-05-14T10:01:00.000-05:002007-05-14T10:01:00.000-05:00Or you have some terrible power. Quick, mention me...Or you have some terrible power. <BR/><BR/>Quick, mention me falling into a bottomless whiskey pool!DiscordianStoogehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03873734789014349292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26159610.post-79284889522384962022007-05-14T09:15:00.000-05:002007-05-14T09:15:00.000-05:00I mention Rev105 going off the air and WHAM over t...I mention Rev105 going off the air and WHAM over the weekend Drive 105 goes off the air. I must have some sort of psychic abilities...Ariashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03069986288222077719noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26159610.post-14160955122632308442007-05-11T14:35:00.000-05:002007-05-11T14:35:00.000-05:00Head on over here http://sorenson.blogspot.com to ...Head on over here http://sorenson.blogspot.com to see what you can do to voice your displeasure with the untimely loss of Drive 105.Sorniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13057350597607764166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26159610.post-39741729455764856302007-05-10T23:54:00.000-05:002007-05-10T23:54:00.000-05:00“HD Radio on the Offense” “But after an investigat...“HD Radio on the Offense” <BR/><BR/>“But after an investigation of HD Radio units, the stations playing HD, and the company that owns the technology; and some interviews with the wonks in DC, it looks like HD Radio is a high-level corporate scam, a huge carny shill.” <BR/><BR/>http://www.eastbayexpress.com/2007-03-07/music/hd-radio-on-the-offense<BR/><BR/>“Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check”<BR/><BR/>“While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD shows no signs of a pulse.”<BR/><BR/>http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_xm_and_h.html<BR/><BR/>"U.S. automakers not jumping into HD Radio"<BR/><BR/>http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2632750220070427?pageNumber=1<BR/><BR/>"Bridge Ratings: Sweat the cell phone and don't count on HD"<BR/><BR/>"In other words, Bridge says interest in HD radio is decreasing even as your station works hard to increase awareness. What can I possibly add to this honest and bleak picture that I haven't said before? My well-intended warnings about HD's "premature death" seem to be rearing their ugly heads almost two years later."<BR/><BR/>http://www.hear2.com/2007/04/bridge_ratings_.html#comments<BR/><BR/>"But is 'availability' of HD radios the problem?"<BR/><BR/>"And one broadcaster reported to me that he asked an iBiquity rep how many HD radios had actually been sold as of the most recent accounting. And this was his answer: 150,000." <BR/><BR/>http://www.hear2.com/2007/04/but_is_availabi.html#comments<BR/><BR/>"Is Pay-for-Play HD Content on Horizon?"<BR/><BR/>http://rwonline.com/pages/s.0049/t.4028.html<BR/><BR/>"HD Radio Effort Undermined by Weak Tuners in Expensive Radios"<BR/><BR/>http://www.mp3newswire.net/stories/7002/hd-radio2.html<BR/><BR/>"The FCC Tunes Into HD Radio--And May Turn Off Distant AM"<BR/><BR/>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2007/03/the_fcc_greenlights_hd_radio_n.html<BR/><BR/>“RW Opinion: Rethinking AM’s future” <BR/><BR/>“Making AM-HD work well as a long-term investment is seen as an expensive and risky challenge for most stations and their owners. There is the significant downside of potential new interference to some of their own AM analog listeners as well as listeners of adjacent-channel stations.”<BR/><BR/>http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.557.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com